场景一:当前有执行DML操作时执行ALTRE操作。# SESSION A mysql> insert into sbtest2 select * from sbtest1; # SESSION B mysql> alter table sbtest2 add test1 int; //等待SESSION A执行完; # SESSION C mysql> show processlist; +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | 267 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 7 | Sending data | insert into sbtest2 select * from sbtest1 | | 271 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 3 | Waiting for table metadata lock | alter table sbtest2 add test1 int | | 272 | root | localhost | NULL | Query | 0 | starting | show processlist | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ 3 rows in set (0.00 sec) # SESSION D mysql> select * from sbtest2 limit 10; //等待元数据锁; # SESSION E mysql> show processlist; +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ | 267 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 20 | Sending data | insert into sbtest2 select * from sbtest1 | | 271 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 13 | Waiting for table metadata lock | alter table sbtest2 add test1 int | | 272 | root | localhost | NULL | Query | 0 | starting | show processlist | | 308 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 3 | Waiting for table metadata lock | select * from sbtest2 limit 10 | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)从上述例子可以看出,我们在执行DDL语句的时候得事先看一下,进程中是否已经存在某些DML语句占用了表的元数据锁,这样会导致DDL语句处于锁等待状态。一旦出现Waiting for table metadata lock等待现象,后续所有对该表的访问都会阻塞在该等待上,包括读操作,导致连接堆积,业务受影响。
场景二:当前有对表的长时间查询或使用mysqldump/mysqlpump时,使用alter会被堵住。# SESSION A mysql> select *,sleep(10) from sbtest2; # SESSION B mysql> alter table sbtest2 add test2 int; //等待SESSION A执行完; # SESSION C mysql> show processlist; +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ | 267 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 12 | User sleep | select *,sleep(10) from sbtest2 | | 271 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 8 | Waiting for table metadata lock | alter table sbtest2 add test3 int | | 272 | root | localhost | NULL | Query | 0 | starting | show processlist | | 311 | root | localhost | NULL | Query | 3 | Waiting for table metadata lock | select * from sbtest.sbtest2 limit 10 | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
场景三:显示或者隐式开启事务后未提交或回滚,比如查询完成后未提交或者回滚,使用alter会被堵住。# SESSION A mysql> begin; mysql> select * from sbtest2; # SESSION B mysql> alter table sbtest2 add test2 int; //等待SESSION A执行完; # SESSION C mysql> show processlist; +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | 267 | root | localhost | sbtest | Sleep | 36 | | NULL | | 271 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 30 | Waiting for table metadata lock | alter table sbtest2 add test2 int | | 272 | root | localhost | NULL | Query | 0 | starting | show processlist | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ 3 rows in set (0.00 sec)
场景四:表上有失败的查询事务,比如查询不存在的列,语句失败返回,但是事务没有提交,此时alter仍然会被堵住。# SESSION A mysql> begin; mysql> select error from sbtest2; ERROR 1054 (42S22): Unknown column 'error' in 'field list' # SESSION B mysql> alter table sbtest2 add test3 int; //等待SESSION A提交或回滚; # SESSION C mysql> show processlist; +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | 267 | root | localhost | sbtest | Sleep | 7 | | NULL | | 271 | root | localhost | sbtest | Query | 3 | Waiting for table metadata lock | alter table sbtest2 add test3 int | | 272 | root | localhost | NULL | Query | 0 | starting | show processlist | | 311 | root | localhost | NULL | Sleep | 413 | | NULL | +-----+------+-----------+--------+---------+------+---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec) # SESSION D mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_trx; Empty set (0.00 sec)其实SESSION A中的事务并未开启,但是由于select获取表元数据的语句,语法上是有效的,虽然执行失败了,但是任然不会释放元数据锁,故而导致SESSION B的alter动作被阻塞。通过SESSION D查看当前打开事务时,你会发现没有,从而找不到原因。所以当出现这种场景时,如何判断是哪个进程导致的呢,我们可以尝试查看表performance_schema. events_statements_current,分析进程状态来进行判断。mysql> select * from performance_schema. events_statements_current/G *************************** 1. row *************************** THREAD_ID: 293 EVENT_ID: 32 END_EVENT_ID: 32 EVENT_NAME: statement/sql/select SOURCE: socket_connection.cc:101 TIMER_START: 2954000 TIMER_END: 2807000 TIMER_WAIT: 113853000 LOCK_TIME: 0 SQL_TEXT: select error from sbtest2 DIGEST: 0bbb2d5d1be45e77debea68111264885 DIGEST_TEXT: SELECT ERROR FROM `sbtest2` CURRENT_SCHEMA: sbtest OBJECT_TYPE: NULL OBJECT_SCHEMA: NULL OBJECT_NAME: NULL OBJECT_INSTANCE_BEGIN: NULL MYSQL_ERRNO: 1054 RETURNED_SQLSTATE: 42S22 MESSAGE_TEXT: Unknown column 'error' in 'field list' ERRORS: 1然后找到其sid, kill掉该session,也可以kill掉DDL所在的session解决可以解决此问题。另外,测试时SESSION A要显式开启一个事务,否则查询会隐式回滚结束,无法重现上面的场景。SESSION B执行alter后,没有立即阻塞住,而是立马开始copy to tmp table,这个过程结束后,才进行了MDL锁等待。这怎么解释呢,应该是执行alter操作主要分为创建临时新表->插入老表的数据->临时新表rename to老表三个步骤,在这种情况下,到最后一步才需要MDL锁,所以copy过程中不会阻塞。由于没有查询在进行,而且查询也没有进入innodb层 (失败返回),所以show processlist和information_schema.innodb_trx没有可以参考的信息。
出现以上几种情况时,这个时候如果进行如下操作就会引起MDL: 创建、删除索引。 修改表结构。 表维护操作(optimize table、repair table等)。 删除表。 获取表上表级写锁 (lock table tab_name write)。